Forman

Yes, you are right, the reason was adblocker.

@FinderKeeper Okay thanks for the information. Regarding the support ticket, I do not have such an item and, accordingly, the ability to send it. Even though I confirmed my email when registering.

It's been more than a week since this bug was moved to the live server. https://forum.kinkoid.com/index.php?/topic/23389-bug-in-market/

I noticed a bug with duplication of items in the market. Steps: 1 I buy items (drag and drop). 2 I scroll down the list to load the next part of the items in the inventory. 3 Items at the end of the old part and the beginning of the new one are duplicated. When buying with a button, duplication does not occur. Only one of the duplicates can be sold. The second disappears only after page refresh.

Is the third place taken by Labyrinth? Market improvements - 14.2% Waifu - 12.4% Boss Bang - 12.1% Labyrinth - 11.1%

Yes. You can open the script and see the changelog. Pay attention to version 0.17.5.

Oui, il y a définitivement quelque chose qui ne va pas avec lui. Son profil.

Looking at the name of the topic with the new contest, for some time I could not understand what worries me about it. Then I realized that it was kisses 💋. Kisses are everywhere, you can't hide from them.

Yes, I just didn't mean the type of event, but its subject matter. Although, of course, I could be wrong and this is not at all related to the upcoming event.

If they said that it will be on social networks, then I think this is related to the upcoming event. Perhaps this is "Circus 2021". Based on the wiki information, Sword Swallower Liu-Yeng and Fortune Teller Carine have been updated.

Reasonable guess. Here's a screenshot from last season.

The fact that for a whole month, they could not change the number in the code, amuses and saddens me. This is nutaku.

Proof that the free kisses received last season have moved into the current one.

Good news. Binding to the game has returned. Forum login is now working. And the avatars seem to be too.

Something else has changed in the harem. live server vs test grid

Can you show their profiles? Isn't there anything suspicious?

Fixed.

So, if someone is interested in knowing the answers to questions such as: 1 Is it possible to reach 0 mojo? 2 What happens if you lose the fight in this position? 3 What kind of fool would do this? I can give clear proven answers. 1 Yes it is possible. 2 Although at the end of the battle it will be shown that you have lost a mojo, however, you will not be able to drop below zero. 3 It seems to be me. Yes, it was a long journey in three weeks with some breaks. Level 12 has been reached! About 400 fights were lost (and a few were won by accident). At the end, I would like to thank my team (Bunny, Juliette and Ankyo) who did an excellent job. Thanks everyone!!!

Tier 10 is an avatar, not a girl.

Well, dialogue is good. I see a flaw in your statement. I can split the topics related to the update into several categories. 1 Removing the Arena and Leaderboards. 2 Mechanics of Seasons. 3 Seasons Design. 4 Testing and reaction to feedback from developers. 5 Content accessible for real money. 6 Influence of the Seasons on other gameplay elements. Which of these is mentioned in the patch note? 2, 6 and partially 1. You say that Category 5 is a crucial point and is worth discussing here. It is reasonable to believe that the decision to introduce this type of content was made deliberately and not at the time the update was released. After all, they calculated the risks. Isn't category 4 more important? That is, knowing that content with access for real money will inevitably entail some negative reaction, they did not try to smooth the situation by testing and fixing the update as much as possible before launching into release. Almost everything that players encountered on live servers was indicated and discussed in the test topic. And despite this, the update was launched into release. So a logical question arises, was it done, even despite the reviews from the test? If so, then what happens on the forum does not have any decisive influence on the developers. If not, and they did not see the problems being discussed, and began to react only when complaints from all sources of feedback began, then there are more important sources of feedback, in contrast to the forum. If we do not have a normal communication channel with them, then what difference does it make what we tell them. And the actions of the developers in the current situation, which they themselves have created, not only does not contribute to the settlement of the situation, but also raises doubts, the very fact of their interest in this. Was there any activity of developers in connection with the influx of players to the forum? An attempt at a dialogue from them and discussing some points? Creating a topic for proposals accepted for consideration, so that users understand what they hear and do not repeat the proposals a hundred times? No. People who are dissatisfied with the update come, write and do not see the feedback from the developers on the forum. Disappointment only grows, and the situation on the forum is heating up. Moderators, which players associate with developers, although they are not, are at the forefront. Their actions by irritated people can be perceived ambiguously. I wrote a "requirement" precisely based on the context of your actions and the previous part of the post. You changed the user's comment, and after his negative reaction to this, you cleared the topic of unnecessary messages, scolded him and issued him a warning. The words of a person who has just punished another person is difficult to perceive differently. Perhaps I alone took it this way.

I do not want to turn you against myself. Your post is of course interesting to read, but it seems to me that you yourself do not comply with your requirement, discuss the notes for the patch, and not the seasons and features associated with their introduction. In the text of the patch notes, I do not see any changes or discussions regarding real-money paywall.

@Noacc Sorry, did the developers read our feedback in the test topic or the decision to release it to the live server was made without it?

Oh, thank you for taking care of me. The user wrote exactly the same as many before him. And you say that his data is worthless because he indicated the wrong time.

Don't you think that 2 out of 4 days were on the test? Or do you prefer to act first and think later? Why is your aggression?