Search the Community

Every week after the reset the when pressing join for the new league it never works. Sometimes it takes over 5 hours after reset for the button to actually work wh8ch means thos3 hours worth of league plays are wasted affecting the overall rankings in the end.

I am curious, why are there no 4-Star girls in the game? Have they gone extinct?

So this has been suggested before in the Leagues discussion amongst other feedback, here it is seperately: we’ve been told that the Leagues is a system allowing us to compare our strenth against other players. So why allow koban refills? I get that devs need to eat, but why not charge somewhere else? This doesn’t make sense to me. I have just made it to the Wanker II league with my 100ish level (now 103, I started in the 90’s). I went through quite some trouble to have good stats and win, and now I’m in am upper league with strong players. There are only 6 players below my level in this league, the remaining 93 players’ levels are way higher—starting at 137 (except two players at 104 and 106), with the top player going as high as 298. I’m confident I can beat a handful of players above my level (perhaps 10). Even if I do I’m pretty sure the week will take its toll on me once I reach my limit and won’t allow me to make it to the next league. Now, 40 minutes in the second session of the Leagues and the top 4 players have already been spending kobans on refills like crazy. So there’s no chance for anyone else catching up to them unless players spend kobans. So... that seems really unfair, first; and second, it defeats the stated purpose of the Leagues. My suggestion is to get rid of the refills. Also, weren’t lower level players with equal score in the Leagues be at the top of the list? Or has this (fair) rule been discarded?

Hi! There is something I would like to discuss/suggest: In the contests, when two players have exactly the same points, they don't have the same ranking as well. Let's say for example that playerA and playerB both have 15,000 points: playerA is ranked 4th but playerB is ranked 5th. It's obvious that there are more criteria for the ranking than each player's points. What are these criteria? And how fair is it for playerB to be in 5th position, which means that he looses the rewards of the above category (2th-4th)? Wouldn't it be better if all the players with the same points to have the same ranking as well?

tous le monde connais qui et le number one du jeu dans la tour de la gloire ( plein de force et d’énergie ), mais avez eu une idée de qui est le dernier de classement ou au delà moi j'ai essayé de descendre le plus bas possible et c'est une descente au enfer a vrai dire , je vous laisse admirer ma découverte a force de descendre le jeu a buger un peu et je me retrouve en hors classement officiel du jeu, mais j'ai encore essayé de voir qui et le plus faible mondialement connu mais j'étais pas prêt pour ça et vous non plus ça m'as tellement choqué que je vais devoir demain un psy ( celui qui opérer the mask dans le cartoon ) en tout cas le classement n'est pas très fiable mais je me suis vraiment marré avec cette -17 088 mojo