Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Wanna hear an April Fools joke? I didn't claim Reko (March Season girl) and Bunnygirl Fukai (the last Path of Valor girl) even through I had them unlocked. I played myself with this joke 😅 

eca.jpg.4232e29d063bcc53ba7f4cfa74cabed8.jpg

Now I have to play for the next 10 years until they bring them back. 

  • Sad 1
  • Surprised :O 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
45 minutes ago, Kojot said:

Wanna hear an April Fools joke? I didn't claim Reko (March Season girl) and Bunnygirl Fukai (the last Path of Valor girl) even through I had them unlocked. I played myself with this joke 😅 

eca.jpg.4232e29d063bcc53ba7f4cfa74cabed8.jpg

Now I have to play for the next 10 years until they bring them back. 

just buy a monthly card 🤪

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, i would have found it funnier if we didn't need to go to the forum to know the giftcode on a normal day :P 

 

On another note, i'm just asking since it's the first time i stock for these event (and ig it's would be too little to go ask in Q/A): Is 105 kiss and 65 combativity good for KC/Mythic?...

I feel like i got quite low numbers but i don't really pinpoint where i failed 🤔 It's the first time i do it so i was prepared for a failed attempt, but even so i don't see how i managed to do it that badly :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

65 is okay but not great for MD. It's normal if you participated in the previous revival (You probably already spent the +50 from Season in that case).

For MD, ideally, you get:

- 20 from regen (Full bar)

- Up to 81 from season (Although you can typically claim the first 15 at the beginning of the month, and only keep the last 66 for next month)

- 35 from PoA (More if you bought the paid path)

- 0 to 38 from PoV, depending on your path and progress

- 20 from daily rewards - day 13 if you time it right

- Some additional combativity from Daily Goals (4 of 5 days worth of it, ~20 to 30 points total)

- Maybe a few points from daily contests on ranks 25+

And then once MD starts, another ~130 to 140 combativity from natural regen (You probably waste a bit of regen the first day because it takes time to exhaust your stored combativity, and a bit of regen at the end of the event because you shouldn't wait the last minute to get your final shards).

(Of course, these values can only be reached if you focus almost exclusively on MD. If you start spending combativity on Classic Event or on MDR, you'll have less points remaining for MD).

Having spent all my March Season rewards on MDR, I currently have 75 combativity (I didn't buy the last PoV, and I spent all of my season combativity on MDR. I'll have +20 from Day 13 rewards in 2 days, just on time for the start of MD).

Regarding kisses, 105 is pretty good. I don't know if it's sufficient though; it will depend on your luck.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
1 hour ago, Boulie2 said:

On another note, i'm just asking since it's the first time i stock for these event (and ig it's would be too little to go ask in Q/A): Is 105 kiss and 65 combativity good for KC/Mythic?...

105 Kisses are a good start. In average you can expect 45-50 Kisses from League and Saeson with natural regen. So with 105 Kisses it should be doable to obtain the next KC-Girl.

With the combativity it's a great question. I don't know your Koban situation but I would prefer to spend the 65 in Classic-Event because it's not such a great amount of combativity and with ca. 150 combativity (your storaged 65 and the 88 natural regen from today and tomorrow) you can get a Classic-Event girl to 75%. In this case start in the MD with a full bar, get ca. 160 combativity from natural regen leds to 180 combativity from ca. 850 needed (calculated with 6% dropchance, chance is between 6% and 7%) so, 45 more (that what you have storged above the 20) are one refill with 50 combatvity (540 Koban), but you will loose the natural regen from two days (108 combativty what is worht more than 1100 Koban).

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Il y a 8 heures, Liliat a dit :

65 is okay but not great for MD. It's normal if you participated in the previous revival (You probably already spent the +50 from Season in that case).

... Not really

Tbh, i just used it on the "120 battle" in the PoA since i was afraid of the contest step (in insight, pretty bad move since it was a CbC anyway so point isn't a problem...)

And i'm stuck for the dailies today since it's asking me to win 20 season fight... :D 

Ig i'll just accept that i'm not nearly enough prepared and follow bolitho's advice 

Il y a 7 heures, bolitho76 a dit :

I don't know your Koban situation

I'm currently at 8 480, but i already have my perfumes, i should be around 9k at the end of the MD

(... I should be higher, but i forgot the day where the league ended so i ended up 31 bc i didn't use my combat xD )

Iirc, 9k and 5 perfume should be good (i even have *more* in case it's on an event girl since i believe in the last MD someone calculated it was better to use it even if there's an event girl)

Il y a 8 heures, Liliat a dit :

Regarding kisses, 105 is pretty good. I don't know if it's sufficient though; it will depend on your luck.

 

Il y a 7 heures, bolitho76 a dit :

105 Kisses are a good start. In average you can expect 45-50 Kisses from League and Saeson with natural regen. So with 105 Kisses it should be doable to obtain the next KC-Girl.

 

Perfect! Thanks a lot :) 

(I'm always worrying about such things, sorry :P )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Il y a 8 heures, Boulie2 a dit :

Tbh, i just used it on the "120 battle" in the PoA since i was afraid of the contest step (in insight, pretty bad move since it was a CbC anyway so point isn't a problem...)

When it's a bit tight, I'd rather spend extra kisses than extra combativity. Better miss a KC girl than a Mythic one :)

But with the Daily Goals now, I find it easier to finish the 120 fights before the end of Day 5, which now leaves me 2 contests to score the 20K points; without spending kisses or combativity.

There are only 1 or 2 contests (out of 20?) that make it difficult to score 20k points, so it's not worth sacrificing so much combativity. It's probably better to spend Kobans in the very rare situation when you can't make it, than "playing safe" and wasting so much combativity (= hundreds of Kobans) each time. Although if I ever find myself in a situation where I can't get the last girl in PoA, I'll just skip her. It's only "one more L3" anyway.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DvDivXXX said:

Random is random... -_-

yeah, random is randon, but ... until a few weeks ago we all believed that a contest cant appear for another 3 days after he was live - but first we had some occurances (on nutaku) with only one other contest in between, and a few days ago we have had a situation were we got the same contest the next day and 2 days later again, so in 4 days 3 times the same contest.

Maybe this was always possible, but since we had multiple situations for the first time since a few weeks, i guess they changed the timer, maybe with the introduction of CumC. (It was also told multiple times in the forum that people who have "seen" a contest 2 days in a row were actually haluzinating (= so strong was the believe that there is a rule of multiple days in between before the same contest can reappear)).

Edited by blaa
  • Like 1
  • Surprised :O 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

This is the first time I hear about this belief, strangely enough. A 3 days grace period before a given contest reappears sounds too specific to come out of nowhere, but at the same time it also sounds too good to be true, and too arbitrary to make more sense than pure random picks. And I don't think it matches even my own experience over the years without particularly paying attention (I typically approach daily contests as groups rather than individual ones, as there are so many near-duplicates). As in, I don't specifically remember for sure the same DC being rolled twice in a row, but I'm almost certain I've seen the same DC reappear after only 48 hours, and I'd even say frequently so.

There are other well documented disparities like the Pachinko one appearing far less often than others, although it feels rarer than it actually is, because its relative scarcity is amplified by the grouping effect I mentioned earlier, as this is the odd one out with no duplicate at all. So, we had many many times a long series of DCs picked from the "donation" group or the "fight villains" group or the "gain XP" group, which all feel the same even though they can technically be different picks. But it's more noticeable when Pachinko or even Sell Items appear, because they stand out against the samey groups.

Bottom line, I don't believe there's a valid reason to suspect anything's changed recently or not in terms of daily contest picks at this time. And I'd be interested in a source if there's one, preferably reliable ofc, for this contest pick cooldown theory. I suspect it's bogus at this point, but I'm willing to look into it if there's a solid base for it.

  • Hug 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, DvDivXXX said:

This is the first time I hear about this belief, strangely enough. A 3 days grace period before a given contest reappears sounds too specific to come out of nowhere, but at the same time it also sounds too good to be true, and too arbitrary to make more sense than pure random picks. And I don't think it matches even my own experience over the years without particularly paying attention (I typically approach daily contests as groups rather than individual ones, as there are so many near-duplicates). As in, I don't specifically remember for sure the same DC being rolled twice in a row, but I'm almost certain I've seen the same DC reappear after only 48 hours, and I'd even say frequently so.

There are other well documented disparities like the Pachinko one appearing far less often than others, although it feels rarer than it actually is, because its relative scarcity is amplified by the grouping effect I mentioned earlier, as this is the odd one out with no duplicate at all. So, we had many many times a long series of DCs picked from the "donation" group or the "fight villains" group or the "gain XP" group, which all feel the same even though they can technically be different picks. But it's more noticeable when Pachinko or even Sell Items appear, because they stand out against the samey groups.

Bottom line, I don't believe there's a valid reason to suspect anything's changed recently or not in terms of daily contest picks at this time. And I'd be interested in a source if there's one, preferably reliable ofc, for this contest pick cooldown theory. I suspect it's bogus at this point, but I'm willing to look into it if there's a solid base for it.

i like how you imply I am not a reliable source, but on the same time you argue with anecdotic evidence that it might not have been so. Oh, well, maybe this is a more "reliable" source, there is plenty more to find ... like I said

image.png.222d4a8b6408a74df3e9e3e0135d4462.png

and just to be clear: for a very long time = since they changed the contest rewards/duration

since i dont know if zoo is reliable enough, i just post a part of a discussion with shal (who you at least respect enought, afaik)

image.png.c9e98cd1e2dfd4292ec23607c1c138e3.png

he wouldnt ask, if he wouldnt assume that there was a 3 day rule, especially when he commented like this afterwards

image.png.0acb89e5673983072a491df4bfb2e82d.png

Edited by blaa
  • Hug 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
21 minutes ago, blaa said:

you imply I am not a reliable source

21 minutes ago, blaa said:

maybe this is a more "reliable" source, there is plenty more to find [zoopokemon]

Oh God, no, not again. Not the dumb misunderstanding followed by immediate attacks based on assuming the worst possible interpretation of what I said without even giving it pause or asking either yourself or me directly whether your assumption is correct and I'm a big meanie or perhaps we should clear the misunderstanding...

Fuck that fucking shit, seriously.

So no, I didn't imply anything, and no neither you, zoopokemon or the President of the Universe would be a reliable source for the theory you mentioned just by mentioning it... That seemed obvious enough to me. If all there is a legend, then it's a fucking legend, and I don't wallow in superstition for odds and another measurable facts in a rational context like this game's mechanics, thanks.

When I mentioned " A SOURCE", I obviously meant a source for THE THEORY SLASH BELIEF ITSELF. As in, where the fuck does this assumption comes from? Who spread it first and on what basis (that wasn't "X and Y said so", again). Was it soft-announced or admitted behind the scenes by someone from Kinkoid? Was it the result of someone's Excel computations showing this kind of trend as likely over a statistically significant data sample? Or did it come out of someone's ass and should be treated as such? That's what I'd like to know.

Clearer now? Good. Let's cut it down with jumping to stupid conclusions and getting butthurt over nothing real, please.

 

Edited by DvDivXXX
(I obviously typed Enter by accident before)
  • Hug 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a same contest not that long ago i think it was two casino/pachinko contest twice in a row before.

i like the donation contest because you either choose to do nothing for the 1 free combativity or just snipe a top 4 spot in last two minutes if its low enough the trick is not to do it early or so someone does not snipe you then you waste ymen for nothing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DvDivXXX said:

Oh God, no, not again. Not the dumb misunderstanding followed by immediate attacks based on assuming the worst possible interpretation of what I said without even giving it pause or asking either yourself or me directly whether your assumption is correct and I'm a big meanie or perhaps we should clear the misunderstanding...

Fuck that fucking shit, seriously.

So no, I didn't imply anything, and no neither you, zoopokemon or the President of the Universe would be a reliable source for the theory you mentioned just by mentioning it... That seemed obvious enough to me. If all there is a legend, then it's a fucking legend, and I don't wallow in superstition for odds and another measurable facts in a rational context like this game's mechanics, thanks.

When I mentioned " A SOURCE", I obviously meant a source for THE THEORY SLASH BELIEF ITSELF. As in, where the fuck does this assumption comes from? Who spread it first and on what basis (that wasn't "X and Y said so", again). Was it soft-announced or admitted behind the scenes by someone from Kinkoid? Was it the result of someone's Excel computations showing this kind of trend as likely over a statistically significant data sample? Or did it come out of someone's ass and should be treated as such? That's what I'd like to know.

Clearer now? Good. Let's cut it down with jumping to stupid conclusions and getting butthurt over nothing real, please.

 

no worries, I will leave already. I thought i might help you guys out here, cause this looked like a crucial information here (since it wasnt just random before (so you gave "false" information)). It's not a "legend", there is data behind, but go search for yourself.

But before I get another warning for nothing, I will leave you alone (btw your reactions are one of the reasons i didnt post much the last few weeks, but i dont think anyone really cares or even noticed - like you said, if we dont like it we can leave, that's what I did and will do again; already regret reading the forum after a long day).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Added:

24 minutes ago, blaa said:

same time you argue with anecdotic evidence that it might not have been so

Wrong again. I simply mentioned that even my own anecdotal and uninterested experience seems to contradict this theory ad hoc. The burden of proof is on the theory makers or, failing that, the theory spreaders. Not on whoever reacts to it for the first time. "This seems strange and unlikely" is basically all I meant. That was not an argument in the debate sense you assumed it to be, sorry.

2 minutes ago, blaa said:

no worries, I will leave already. I thought i might help you guys out here, cause this looked like a crucial information here (since it wasnt just random before (so you gave "false" information)). It's not a "legend", there is data behind, but go search for yourself.

But before I get another warning for nothing, I will leave you alone (btw your reactions are one of the reasons i didnt post much the last few weeks, but i dont think anyone really cares or even noticed - like you said, if we dont like it we can leave, that's what I did and will do again; already regret reading the forum after a long day).

Sorry you had a long day. So did I. And a long weekend, and a long week and a long last few months. I'm not taking it out on you or anyone else online, though. I'd appreciate the same basic courtesy.

As for your claims, you can shove them where the sun don't shine as far as I'm concerned.

1/ I have better things to do than arguing with you over this vague secret info you mention and then refuse to source, but take great offense for my basic and reasonable questioning about it and where it came from. You can claim there is data, but I won't go and search for it, thanks. That's not something I care about particularly myself. I simply asked if anyone reading, had more info or an actual source (eg data or info, not hear-say) about the theory you brought up. My post you misread as so personal you took offense from it wasn't even really addressed at you, certainly at you in particular.

I "gave false information" if that floats your boat, dude. A flat-earther could also say the same thing about the last time I said the Earth is round, though, and they'd be as credible as you without backing up their extraordinary claim.

2/ You never got a warning for nothing. I'm disappointed you still don't understand what that old warning meant, though. Because you're not likely to stop this shitty attitude if you don't notice it first.

3/ You didn't post as much as usual over the past few weeks? Okay, I hadn't noticed indeed. Not sure if anyone else cares, but I sure don't. And "my reactions" are one of the reasons for that? Well, guess what? Your hairstyle is one of the reasons for my disliking your cryptic and annoying as fuck attempts at clashing with me for no reasons, then... Oh, wait. No, it's not. Your annoying attitude is the thing that annoys me. Please cut it out. And no, I won't send you another formal warning for that. You've proven it's useless, unfortunately.

Anyways, if your panties are still in a twist over me, send a report that will be another mod's problem. 
Or if you'd actually like you and I to understand each other and get along better, maybe start by spitting out what exactly is your problem with "my reactions" instead of making a vague character assassination and playing the victim over nothing even remotely palpable.

FULL STOP.

---------
To anyone else: if you have actual info or data on this "3-day cooldown for random daily contest picks" theory, please share. Don't be afraid, I don't bite. I do call out bullshit, though. Thanks in advance.

No comments on the personal attacks from @blaa to me, and no further comments on my personality or my shirt size, though. If you have a problem with me, either shut up and deal with it on your own, or try to communicate sincerely and in a non-confrontational way with me about it (preferably on Discord, though I don't visit it daily these days), or send a bitchy wannabe smartass report complaining about me. We mods just love useless and unfounded drama and petty nitpicks blown out of proportions. :ph34r: /s

  • Thinking 1
  • Sad 1
  • Hug 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...