Moderator bolitho76 Posted March 27 Moderator Share Posted March 27 27 minutes ago, Der DinX said: Not sure how the test server works in this game, what I read so far is, that you start from scratch and have to develop your account, like in every other clone. Correct. At the highest League a test (s1) we have ca. 180 player from ca lvl380-650. In W3 should be some lvl400+ more. There was a time the test-server was much more populated (S3 with 2 brackets was reached) but since they didn't used test for gems and much more other features, more and more quitted. I don't know why KK had done their test-server in this way, but it would be much better they would shut down what we have now and would create a meaningfull system with a clone. But it's KK and so meaningfull.... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grifs Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 I'm sorry but why again this visual patch has been applied. It's horibly glitchy. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HornyCat Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 As per is usual for these totally inept coders/programmers, yet another patch/update, and yet another one or more things they "break", while doing it. AND .... still no fixing of the Harem rankings, which as I posted last week, I figure it will be at least another 6 months before it is fixed, IF it ever gets fixed at all, that is. DOH! That is why it is a total farce, when Rosso says things like "15-20 mins a day" for doing the Lab, yet with neither him nor any of the people at KK actually playing this game, not a single one of them has any real idea, on how long it takes to do anything in this game. LOL 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jelom Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 KK announcing in the patch notes that they will implement an AVS (Age Verification System) as per the new laws in France. As always the justification for that law is protecting the minors, what a lie! We know that AGE verification is in fact IDENTITY verification, and many people, including me, don't want that to happen, because it always mean more control over people. I don't trust that my personal data will be secure enough. Hackers will breach it sooner or later, that data will very probably be sold (secretly) to another bussiness, and finally, the government will not let pass the opportunity to put their hands on that data with whatever excuse. If I am forced to pass that filter, I will surely abandon the game. Unfortunately my prediction for this game future (and for porn in general in internet) is very dark because of this issue. Remember, first they will force you to verify your age ( identity ) just for porn sites, but slowly they will add more and more categories not related to porn until you won't be able to access internet if you are not identified beforehand. Sorry for the speech, but I couldn't help myself. I am very sad because we can do nothing against that. 6 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horsting Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Seconded. Sadly, the way sexuality is still widely treated nowadays (this law is quite a prove), makes it impossible for me to share my identify online with anything related to it, no matter whether I in general trust the related actor or not. I am not talking about porn where the origin of the content, the free uninfluenced consent, and also age of all participants is questionable. IMO it makes sense for porn websites to (be forced to) verify as good as possible that no one got hurt or abused for the content they host/share. It is a delicate matter and much shit happens behind the scenes of a lot of (unprofessional) porn, same like with prostitution. However, this does not mean that porn or prostitution is bad per se, and in case of HH/KK we are talking about a game with paintings, not real human, in case of PSH it is at least verified known porn stars. For the consumers: IMO the right way to deal with children consuming porn is open education. In the end it is not so much different than (violent) movies, video games, beauty in (social) media, etc, where it is essential that one knows about/keeps separate fiction/fake/entertainment from reality. When doing so, also the movie/game/beauty tip/porn can be educational/inspiring. Trying to prevent everyone below 18 (long after the interest in sex arises) to access porn is IMO counter productive and a waste of resources. It just shows how much behind the moon some politicians live, or that they are too much afraid of people who live behind the moon, trying to please them for next election, while knowing that it is nonsense. We can only hope that KK fulfils the law in the most minimal possible way, allowing e.g. bypassing any identity check via VPN. Otherwise I'm out, too. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdnoria Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Technically, there is a possibility to verify someone is adult without giving your identity to anyone except a state site and without it knowing what site you are visiting. That's in my expertise domain. <Service Provider / HH> --> Is myserviceUserId legal? --> <Trust Service> <Trust Service> --> I need a proof if is adult --> <Country Identity Service> <Country Identity Service> --> is adult response + signature --> <Trust Service> <Trust Service> --> answer is myserviceUserId legal --> <Service Provider / HH> The only thing needed is the Country Identity Service to have an private signing key for each trust service enrolled. Each Trust Service should have the corresponding public key to check the answer has not been altered by the user. At the end : your country only knows that the Trust Service asked if you were legal for adult content but not the service used the Trust Service knows your country and an opaque service identifier and if you are legal or not the Service Provider does not have your real identity, only that you are legal for the adult content The identity does not need to be transferred. The whole thing works a bit like OAuth2 but with 3 tiers instead of two (SP/IdP). --- My point of view : I find this stupid and there will always be means to bypass this but I don't know how it will turn out. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpanda Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 (edited) I appreciate the fact they fixed a bunch of things, but I feel like some of the descriptions were vague to the point of not being clear what was fixed. I thought 2 maybe applied to things I had seen but verified they did not. Perhaps it is me, hopefully your items got fixed and you know 😜 If the team cannot be write specific notes (desire or capability), it would be nice if there was some sort of ID associated with what they are fixing that could be given via support ticket as well as patch notes. Most tracking system would have this and even if you're using Excel or a bulleted (numbered) list it'd have it. PS: That would also give incentive to report things even if known bugs, e.g. to get the ID. On their end a better record of the number of times they gave it out (if they care to track it) which would tell how many people bothered to report and speak to "popularity". Vs...say...having a survey where I must remember every bug I reported 😜 Edited April 12 by jpanda PS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now