On this topic. A good solution would be to make a wikipedia button next to the social media buttons and show all the poses of new characters there at once, so that players can immediately decide whether they want to see them in their harem or not. But I am afraid that the artists will begin to act in logic: "I cannot draw a beautiful girl with an original character, so I just draw a dick for the girl - and she will definitely become original and not like the others."
Such phenomena not only exist in context, but also create context. In the format you advocate, it is not a context of integration and acceptance, but a context of war (often a war against windmills and common sense).
If you get the same question all the time ... perhaps this is because the moment comes when this question must inevitably be asked, and this is somehow connected with your logical constructions.
What I see: 1) an attempt to create an association between me and some group ... and I suspect that this association should have a negative connotation (if you want me to understand you, it is better to write the full name, not an abbreviation) 2) an attempt to declare arguments pointing to gaps in your logical constructions, mockery of fighters for something very big and sacred (show me these jokers - I will send them a formidable smiley) 3) an attempt to label me (you already kept this label ready, looking around around in search of a candidate, but I didn't think it would happen so quickly).
What I do not see: the arguments with which you shoot down the helicopters (arguments) of your opponents.
For windia
This means that the picture in my head is true only if it can withstand the collision with reality.
The three of us (you, me and DvDivXXX) can create a common social field. We can agree that from now on and forever an apple is an orange. The problem is that if we meet a fourth person who is not part of our social field, he will immediately see that in front of him is not quite an orange. (I sincerely hope that DvDivXXX does not burn this man at the stake in the name of global tolerance.)