Jump to content

Shorty-er

Members
  • Posts

    179
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Shorty-er

  1. Wow. I'm impressed. You reverse engineered my brain fart! But yes, you are almost certainly correct in where I went wrong.
  2. Really? Seriously, I only remember reading about people hoping there would not be mythic items. Maybe these people simply had no faith in how KK would implement them, or maybe I just missed some /sarc markers? IDK. OK. I stand corrected. Partly. On that point
  3. Feedback I've seen regularly in the forum: We don't have enough books and affinity items please don't do mythical items. Reaction by KK: Hold our beer! Not only will we introduce mythical items, not only will we do it in such a way you will end up with *LESS* books and affinity items, we'll even claim we did it as a result of player feedback! Well played, KK.
  4. Dharry, is er nog plek bij die taalverloederaars?
  5. Ah! That's a nice picture of the altar of my gods! A 1-star chocolate girl! Or 10. Or 35.
  6. You started off reasonable, but then ended completely out of wack. There is no point where you can speak of having an excess of chocolate. Let alone a bad excess of chocolate. Don't be silly.
  7. Sorry @DvDivXXX, I did read your post but was very busy this weekend. It's not really important, I do understand what you wrote, I'll quickly explain why I don't agree, and then we can both move on . >So, unless someone has a self-imposed no-PvP policy Bingo! It's not so much a no-PvP policy, it's that I'm not interested in PvP. If/when I am, I'll fire up LoL and get into some real PvP. In this game, I couldn't care less. And so I don't play in Leagues. The fact that it's PvP as well as the insurmountable advantage older players have, have taken all my interest away. When I read about players who keep an eye on opponents to find the right (unboosted) time to pounce, I find that funny but I also know I will never get that much into this game. The result of my style of play was that I leveled my account rather more slowly, have relatively better upgraded girls (compared to others of same level), and actually do fairly well in contents, if/when I want to. Medium shark in a small pond vs medium shark in a big sea kinda deal. I still think that this is the smart play for *all* new players. Now that I've reached level 300 the smart play would probably be to head to the leagues, but meh... PvP . For me league is just an easy way to get PvP wins when I want them for a contest. Now, I realize it's my choice not to participate, and I don't begrudge the older players their koban printing machines. I don't begrudge other players regular updates to the PvP aspects of the game. But (and this seems to be where we disagree) even though this feature doesn't add new PvP fights or options, it is yet again a PvP centric update. As such, it confirms a worry I have had for a while now as the game keeps moving more and more towards PvP. It's not so much that I am against this update, it is that I would like to see updates to other parts of the game as well. Which is why I was initially so happy with the dating tokens. While I was busy this weekend, I did think about my response to you, and wondered why I still play this game. The surprising answer was "Probably just inertia." So I have decided to finish upgrading one of my mythicals (only 10k affinity left), just for kicks. And then I'll take an indefinite break from the game.
  8. Exactly! I couldn't (and didn't ) say it better myself. More rewards in PvP. But sure, "this event has almost nothing to do with PvP". You're a smart person but I have no idea how you can put those two quotes in one post. As for the adding PvP to PvP bit: I didn't come up with that. KK did. The meme is in the post on kinkoid.com that announces this feature. So you quoted me quoting (or paraphrasing) KK, and say I'm complaining under false pretenses? I'm still confused, but don't worry, it's time for dinner .
  9. With the previous update I was happy to see a reinforcement to something that isn't PvP. Unfortunately with this update we're right back. As the meme showed: we're now adding PvP to your PvP. Sure. Whatever. A first impression on 10 battles in Season and 15 in Leages leave me with the impression that I won't earn enough shards to get the girl in 2 days. Assuming the next 2 days KC have another girl, this is just going to add more incomplete girls to my harem. And assuming higher levels in Leages don't award more shards. This will probably end up as yet another feature of the game I don't care about. As for spending kobans to complete the girls, this is where I get confused. If we're moving more and more away from a collection game (where I spend kokans to get girls) to a PvP game (where I spend kobans to get better, so I can earn girls through PvP), then why would I spend kobans on a 3-star legendary girl? I'll just save them all up for the next mythical girl.
  10. I think it's a safe bet that the drops from villains was calculated for 10 tokens a day (4,166666%).
  11. ---------------------------------------------------- Villains-- 9 drops in 194 battles. (Drop range: 5-5) EPx1----- 0 drops in 18 EPx1 spins. Drop range: 0-0 EPx10--- 0 drops in X EPx10 spins. Drop range: 0-0 EvP------ 0 drops in X EvP spins. Drop range: 0-0 ---------------------------------------------------- (Sorry, lost track of things in the mythic battles. I can't say better than "a lot" of drops in "a lot" of battles )
  12. 4 drops of 5 with 92 combativity. 0 tokens from 5 epic orbs. 10 tokens a day, only during selected events. I have a Rare with 15 shards missing. I need 90 tokens to complete... I feel we can leave out the "nearly" and can safely conclude this is of so little worth it won't affect my playing in attempts to optimize the collection of tokens. I'm *so* disappointed now
  13. I'm quite curious about the dating thingies and happy something like this is introduced! A lot will depend on the quantities that will become available of course. I agree with Div they'll only/mostly be used for epic and legendary. The current cost in dating tokens might be OK, as long as enough drop. Personally I'd rather see Mythical girls blocked and more dating tokens available than have mythicals included and the tokens be rare. If tokens are easy enough to get, they will make mythical x 3 and x6 orbs much more interesting. ATM I only use those when I'm guaranteed to get the girl. So generally I only use them when I have only 1 girl left and I have enough orbs. So very rarely :D. With tokens I can use the x3 and x6 orbs to get some shards, and later "complete" the girl with dating tokens. We'll see!
  14. There were some other (smaller) issues leading up to the time change as well. For example, PoPs would say "Complete in 8 hours", which gets KK points for trying, but still factually incorrect (I hope). Meanwhile, Market would say "New stock in 8 hours" as normal. So, there was some lack of consistency there. It only happens twice a year (and hopefully soon no more at all), so I can't really blame KK for not investing lots of time in this. But I admit, I couldn't care less about PoA .
  15. Humanity (mostly) managed to do it with dates, you'd think time would be next. But noooo... <shudder> I'm with Chthuga, both geographically and with his position in this. And with his fear we might "simply" follow germany Edit: and what an odd topic to discuss here!
  16. There are only 2 issues with the 1-star girls. 1) Communication. KK have done themselves a disservice here, but unfortunately that's nothing new. Had the introduction of PoP come with a warning that orbs might/would be removed somewhere else later on, there wouldn't be such a hassle about that now. And introducing the girls with text about "balancing" the myth girls again only raised issues. But if people take a deep breath, count to 10 (backwards! ) and realize the one was going to happen anyway (and we live in an ever-changing universe, even online), and the other is just fluff, than it becomes more of a Meh than a problem. Right? 2) Like others, I prefer less girls of better quality. That is a personal preference and I can't expect devs to work to my preferences. Unfortunately. So, like I said. There are no issues with the 1-star girls.
  17. Same. Been locked out 5 times now.
  18. And again, for the 3rd time tonight, while selling stuff from the market. A game I can't play isn't a game. KK needs to stop creating events that generate more traffic than their servers can handle.
  19. Yes, I was collecting from my harem. But I do that every day, never had this problem and now twice in a row. Thanks for the info on recovering. I'm gonna have a try. Edit: btw, I was messing about on an alt as well, in a different browser (not just different window, but completely different browser) and that alt too dropped into the 500 error. So I'm not really sure. It might not be for everyone, but it does look as if *something* is blocking things? It makes it unlikely that clearing caches and such will solve anything.
  20. I'm confused. Not complaining, but still confused. I just got Adelaide, Winter Edna and some blond girl, with just 12 or 13 spins. That's not supposed to happen, right? Did something change in the drop rate? I now really *really* regret not spinning for the tanned housemaid . I'd swap these 3 just for the maid. Edit: I went and counted how many avatars I got: 11. So it was a few more then 12 or 13 spins. But still... Also: I'm off to buy lottery tickets now. My luck is probably used up, but just in case there's some left... .
  21. I now have 2 myth girls... and no 1 stars. I think KK got it wrong. A girl that you can get simply by throwing money (or kobans) at, is *easy*, not mythical. A girl that you have to work through 1000s of fights for, now that is hard!
  22. I'm confused. I have absolutely no idea how you went from what I said to your reaction. If you want to give your opinion on this game feature, do so. If you want to react to what I say, cool. But don't put words in my mouth please. We clearly don't understand each other good enough for you to do that what any accuracy or meaning. I haven't taken a poll, but I feel like almost none of the members in the club are interested. And I say that as one of those who is not good enough to do it myself.
  23. Sorry, no. My club easily has the heavy hitters, even I make the cut according to your definition (not according to me though ). We *can* defeat the champion, we *did* defeat him a number a times direct after release. Thing is we simply lack the interest to do so any more or consistently. And that is strictly a effort/reward issue. It is not our club, it is this feature that is not competitive against all the other options in the game. I agree with you the idea has merit, just not this particular execution of the idea
×
×
  • Create New...